0.07/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.07/0.12	% Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 300
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 300
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Fri Jul  5 04:24:54 EDT 2024
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.35	This is a THF_ problem
0.12/0.35	Running vampire_ho --cores 8 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol -m 12000  -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.12/0.37	% (6340)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:s2agt=32:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=385:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/385Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6337)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/96Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6339)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=34:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/34Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6338)lrs+10_1:2_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=36:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/36Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6341)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/17Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6343)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/4Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6342)ott+1010_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:kws=inv_arity:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:sp=const_frequency:i=74:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/74Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6344)lrs+1002_1:14_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=unused:sac=on:sos=on:i=915:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/915Mi)
0.12/0.37	% (6340)First to succeed.
0.12/0.38	% (6340)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.12/0.38	% SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
0.12/0.38	% SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
0.12/0.38	thf(func_def_1, type, cP: $i > $o).
0.12/0.38	thf(func_def_6, type, sK0: ($i > $o) > $i).
0.12/0.38	thf(func_def_9, type, ph2: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.12/0.38	thf(f63,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  $false),
0.12/0.38	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f61,f12])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f12,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (a != b)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f11,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (((($true != (cP @ (sK0 @ X0))) & ($true = (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)))) | ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != $true) | ((X0 @ b) = $true)) & ((cP @ a) = $true) & (a != b))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f9,f10])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f10,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : (? [X1] : (($true != (cP @ X1)) & ((X0 @ X1) = $true)) => (($true != (cP @ (sK0 @ X0))) & ($true = (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0)))))),
0.12/0.38	  introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f9,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X1] : (($true != (cP @ X1)) & ((X0 @ X1) = $true)) | ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) != $true) | ((X0 @ b) = $true)) & ((cP @ a) = $true) & (a != b))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(rectify,[],[f8])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f8,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X2] : (((cP @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) | ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((X0 @ b) = $true)) & ((cP @ a) = $true) & (a != b))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(flattening,[],[f7])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f7,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ! [X0 : $i > $o] : ((? [X2] : (((cP @ X2) != $true) & ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) | ! [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) != $true) | ((X0 @ b) = $true)) & ((a != b) & ((cP @ a) = $true)))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f6,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ~? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((a != b) & ((cP @ a) = $true)) => (! [X2] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) => ((cP @ X2) = $true)) & ? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ((X0 @ b) != $true)))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(flattening,[],[f5])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f5,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ~? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((a != b) & ((cP @ a) = $true)) => (~((X0 @ b) = $true) & ? [X1] : ((X0 @ X1) = $true) & ! [X2] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) => ((cP @ X2) = $true))))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f4,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ~? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((a != b) & (cP @ a)) => (~(X0 @ b) & ? [X1] : (X0 @ X1) & ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (cP @ X2))))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
0.12/0.38	  ~? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((a != b) & (cP @ a)) => (~(X0 @ b) & ? [X1] : (X0 @ X1) & ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (cP @ X2))))),
0.12/0.38	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f1,conjecture,(
0.12/0.38	  ? [X0 : $i > $o] : (((a != b) & (cP @ a)) => (~(X0 @ b) & ? [X1] : (X0 @ X1) & ! [X2] : ((X0 @ X2) => (cP @ X2))))),
0.12/0.38	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBLEDSOE6)).
0.12/0.38	thf(f61,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  (a = b)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f58])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f58,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ($true != $true) | (a = b)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(superposition,[],[f57,f13])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f13,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ((cP @ a) = $true)),
0.12/0.38	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f57,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ X0)) | (b = X0)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f56])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f56,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (($true != (cP @ X0)) | (b = X0) | (b = X0)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(superposition,[],[f31,f26])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f26,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sK0 @ (= @ X0)) = X0) | (b = X0)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(equality_proxy_clausification,[],[f16])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f16,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((sK0 @ (= @ X0)) = X0) | ((X0 = b) = $true)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f14])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f14,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i > $o] : (($true = (X0 @ (sK0 @ X0))) | ((X0 @ X2) != $true) | ((X0 @ b) = $true)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f31,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((cP @ (sK0 @ (= @ X0))) != $true) | (b = X0)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(leibniz_equality_elimination,[],[f15])).
0.12/0.38	thf(f15,plain,(
0.12/0.38	  ( ! [X2 : $i,X0 : $i > $o] : (($true != (cP @ (sK0 @ X0))) | ((X0 @ b) = $true) | ((X0 @ X2) != $true)) )),
0.12/0.38	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
0.12/0.38	% SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
0.12/0.38	% (6340)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (6340)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 934bd2fae on 2023-06-16 16:02:25 +0100)
0.12/0.38	% (6340)Termination reason: Refutation
0.12/0.38	
0.12/0.38	% (6340)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.12/0.38	% (6340)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
0.12/0.38	% (6340)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.12/0.38	% (6340)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (6340)------------------------------
0.12/0.38	% (6336)Success in time 0.005 s
0.12/0.38	% Vampire---4.8 exiting
0.12/0.38	EOF